I found this post on facebook and thought it was interesting how we can analyse and look at things from various view point. #Cricket View Point.
Summary
Each stadium’s design and associated costs reflect its intended use, location-specific requirements, and economic considerations. The Providence Stadium focuses on cost-efficiency and traditional design, offering a larger capacity, whereas the Tarouba Stadium invests in modern architecture and potentially better facilities, albeit with a smaller audience capacity.
| Factor | Providence Cricket Stadium, Guyana | Tarouba Cricket Stadium, Trinidad |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | $25 million USD ($175 million TTD) | $214 million USD ($1.5 billion TTD) |
| Capacity | 20,000 | 15,000 |
| Aesthetics & Layout | Traditional, open layout with ample green spaces around the seating area, providing a more relaxed and natural environment for spectators. | Modern, compact design that may offer better views and an intimate experience for the audience. Uses bold, contemporary architecture. |
| Accessibility | Appears to have ample space for parking and easy access for both pedestrians and vehicles, facilitating better traffic management. | Compact design suggests limited space for parking and access, which could lead to congestion during major events. |
| Use of Space | Efficient use of surrounding land, potentially better for crowd dispersal and additional facilities like merchandise stores, food courts, etc. | More focused on the stadium structure itself with less emphasis on external facilities, which could limit additional commercial uses. |
| Potential for Expansion | The surrounding green space offers potential for future expansion or development, such as adding more stands or facilities. | The compact nature and modern design may restrict expansion unless there are already provisions in the design. |
| Sustainability | Traditional design might have less impact during construction compared to more modern structures, potentially lower maintenance costs due to simpler design. | Modern materials and construction techniques might incorporate energy-efficient features and advanced technologies for sustainability but could be costlier to maintain. |
| Atmosphere | Open and expansive, potentially offering a more relaxed atmosphere conducive to long-duration sports like cricket. | Closer seating and modern design can enhance the excitement and energy, improving the spectator experience during crucial matches. |
| Visibility and Acoustics | Likely to have good visibility due to the absence of obstructive structures, but acoustics may not be as contained due to the open design. | Designed to optimize spectator views and might have better acoustics due to the surrounding structures keeping sound within the arena. |
| Factor | Providence Cricket Stadium, Guyana | Score | Tarouba Cricket Stadium, Trinidad | Score | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | Lower cost, better ROI | 8 | Higher cost, potential for higher standards | 5 | 15% |
| Capacity | Larger, more revenue potential | 8 | Smaller, less revenue potential | 5 | 10% |
| Aesthetics & Layout | Traditional, spacious | 7 | Modern, compact, visually appealing | 8 | 10% |
| Accessibility | Easier access, better traffic management | 9 | More difficult access, potential congestion | 6 | 10% |
| Use of Space | Ample space for multi-use | 8 | Limited external facility space | 5 | 15% |
| Potential for Expansion | Easier expansion due to space | 8 | Restricted by initial compact design | 5 | 10% |
| Sustainability | Less resource-intensive, potentially less sustainable | 6 | Includes sustainable technologies | 9 | 15% |
| Atmosphere | Relaxed, open | 7 | Intimate, energetic | 9 | 10% |
| Visibility and Acoustics | Good visibility, less effective acoustics | 7 | Enhanced visibility and acoustics | 9 | 5% |
| Total Score (Estimated) | 7.3/10 | 7.0/10 | 100% | ||
Note: The scores are based on assumptions due to a lack of detailed information on certain aspects. We assume both stadiums are well-constructed to withstand Category 5 hurricanes and seismic activities. Details such as the cost of tickets, internal facilities like bathrooms, internet access, and comfort levels of housing facilities are not known and are assumed to meet top international cricket stadium standards. For standards of housing facilities in top cricket stadiums, modern amenities and comfort are expected to match or exceed facilities found in leading stadiums globally.
NOTES about other places in the world.
Here’s a list of some cricket stadiums around the world along with their construction costs:
Melbourne Cricket Ground, Australia:
- Cost: Approximately AUD $150 million for the most recent renovation in 2006.
- Note: This stadium is one of the largest in the world and has undergone several renovations, the most extensive of which was before the 2006 Commonwealth Games.
Eden Gardens, Kolkata, India:
- Cost: Estimated around ₹500 crore (approximately $65 million USD) for renovations in 2011.
- Note: This is one of India’s oldest and most iconic cricket stadiums, with upgrades done before the 2011 Cricket World Cup.
Lord’s Cricket Ground, London, UK:
- Cost: The new Compton and Edrich stands, completed in 2021, cost approximately £52 million.
- Note: Often referred to as the “Home of Cricket,” Lord’s has been updated numerous times since its founding in 1814.
The Optus Stadium, Perth, Australia:
- Cost: Construction was around AUD $1.6 billion.
- Note: Opened in 2018, it’s a multi-purpose stadium that hosts cricket among other sports and events.
Kensington Oval, Barbados:
- Cost: Approximately $135 million USD for the renovation in 2007.
- Note: This renovation was primarily for hosting the 2007 Cricket World Cup final.
Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai, India:
- Cost: Renovations in 2010-2011 cost about ₹300 crore (around $40 million USD).
- Note: The renovations were undertaken in preparation for the 2011 Cricket World Cup.
Sardar Patel Stadium, Ahmedabad, India:
- Cost: The reconstruction cost about ₹800 crore (approximately $110 million USD).
- Note: Also known as Motera Stadium, it was entirely rebuilt and is now the largest cricket stadium in the world by seating capacity.
Sophia Gardens, Cardiff, Wales:
- Cost: The stadium underwent a £9.4 million redevelopment in 2008.
- Note: It was upgraded to host international cricket, including matches of the 2009 Ashes series.
These costs reflect a mixture of new constructions and significant renovations, illustrating the wide range of investment in cricket infrastructure globally. The figures can vary greatly depending on the extent of work carried out, location, and economic conditions at the time of construction or renovation.
